Tuesday, December 6, 2011

AP Interview: Iraq PM confident in post-US future (AP)

BAGHDAD ? Weeks before the U.S. pullout, Iraq's prime minister confidently predicted Saturday that his country will achieve stability and remain independent of its giant neighbor Iran even without an American troop presence.

Nouri al-Maliki also warned of civil war in Iran's ally Syria if Bashar Assad falls ? a view that puts him closer to Tehran's position and at odds with Washington. The foreign policy pronouncement indicates that Iraq is emerging from the shadows of U.S. influence in a way unforeseen when U.S.-led forces invaded eight years ago to topple Saddam Hussein.

"The situation in Syria is dangerous," al-Maliki told The Associated Press during an interview at his office in a former Saddam-era palace in Baghdad's Green Zone. "Things should be dealt with appropriately so that the spring in Syria does not turn into a winter."

The Obama administration has been outspoken in its criticism of Assad's bloody crackdown on protests that the U.N. says has killed more than 4,000 people so far, the bloodiest in a wave of uprisings that have been dubbed the Arab Spring.

Iraq has been much more circumspect and abstained from key Arab League votes suspending Syria's membership and imposing sanctions on the country. That has raised concern that Baghdad is succumbing to Iranian pressure to protect Assad's regime. Tehran is Syria's main backer.

Al-Maliki insisted that Iraq will chart its own policies in the future according to national interests, not the dictates of Iran or any other country.

Some U.S. officials have suggested that Iranian influence in Iraq would inevitably grow once American troops depart.

Both countries have Shiite majorities and are dominated by Shiite political groups. Many Iraqi politicians spent time in exile in Iran under Saddam's repressive regime, and one of al-Maliki's main allies ? anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr ? is believed to spend most of his time in Iran.

"Iraq is not a follower of any country," al-Maliki said. He pointed out several areas in which Iraq had acted against Iran's desires, including the signing of the security agreement in 2008 that required all U.S. forces to leave Iraq by the end of this year. Iran had been pushing for all American troops to be out of the country even sooner.

"Through our policies, Iraq was not and will not be a follower of another country's policies," he said.

But he also took pains to emphasize that Iraq did want to maintain good relations with Iran as the two countries share extensive cultural, economical and religious ties.

"Clearly, we are no enemy to Iran and we do not accept that some who have problems with Iran would use us as a battlefield. Some want to fight Iran with Iraqi resources as has happened in the past. We do not allow Iran to use us against others that Iran has problems with, and we do not allow others to use us against Iran," he said.

The prime minister defended his country's stance when it comes to how to address the instability roiling neighboring Syria right now.

The U.N.'s top human rights official said this week that Syria is in a state of civil war and that more than 4,000 people have been killed since March.

Al-Maliki said Iraq believes the Syrian people's rights should be protected and that his government has told the Syrian regime that the age of one party and one sect running the country is over. Syria is ruled by a minority Alawite regime, an offshoot of Shiism, that rules over a Sunni Muslim majority.

The Iraqi prime minister even said that members of the Syrian opposition had recently asked to come to Iraq, and that his government would meet with them. But he distanced himself from calls for Assad's ouster, warning that could plunge the country into civil war.

"The killing or removal of President Bashar in any way will explode into an internal struggle between two groups and this will have an impact on the region," al-Maliki said.

"My opinion ? I also lived in Syria for more than 16 years ? is that it will end with civil war and this civil war will lead to alliances in the region. Because we are a country that suffered from the civil war of a sectarian background, we fear for the future of Syria and the whole region," he said.

Al-Maliki also insisted his forces were ready to take over security during a wide-ranging discussion on where his country stands ahead of the Dec. 31 departure of all American troops.

"Nothing has changed with the withdrawal of the American forces from Iraq on the security level because basically it has been in our hands," he said.

The U.S. withdrawal has occurred in stages, with the American military pulling out of the cities in 2008, leaving the soldiers largely confined to bases as Iraqi security forces took the lead. About 13,000 U.S. troops are still in the country, down from a one-time high of about 170,000.

Al-Maliki said he was grateful to the United States for overthrowing Saddam.

"We appreciate that, no doubt," the prime minister said, adding he was not worried about a resumption of the type of sectarian warfare that pushed his own country to the brink of civil war in the years following the 2003 U.S.-led invasion.

On the contrary, he said violence would decline because the Americans' departure would remove one of the main reasons for attacks.

"What was taking place during the presence of the American forces will decrease in the period after the withdrawal," he said. "Some people find a pretext in the presence of the American forces to justify their acts, but now what justification will they come up with?"

___

Associated Press writer Sameer N. Yacoub contributed to this report.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/world/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111203/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_iraq_maliki_interview

chelsea handler alexander the great act alabama football 21 jump street 19 kids and counting 2011 election results

Monday, December 5, 2011

AMR creditors' committee may be an eclectic mix (Reuters)

(Reuters) ? Labor unions, suppliers and other groups with potential claims against bankrupt AMR Corp will gather on Monday to vie for a seat on what could be an eclectic committee of creditors.

The office of the U.S. Trustee, which oversees bankruptcy cases, is expected to appoint the committee at a meeting on Monday at the Sheraton Hotel in Manhattan.

Creditors' committees, common in most corporate bankruptcies, advocate for the collective rights of unsecured creditors - those whose claims are not secured by collateral.

But for AMR, the American Airlines parent whose pension plans are about $10.2 billion in the red, those creditors' interests may not always be aligned.

"The nature of the airline business leads to a more diverse group of creditors than your standard bankruptcy because you have labor, municipalities and so on," said Bill Brandt, chief executive of turnaround consultant Development Specialists Inc.

AMR, whose American Airlines subsidiary is the third-largest U.S. carrier, filed for bankruptcy on Tuesday, listing nearly $30 billion in liabilities. The last of the major U.S. carriers to go bankrupt, the company cited a need to improve its cost structure after talks with labor unions hit a standstill.

The labor interest will likely be well-represented on the committee, as the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp, the government agency that insures pension plans, has already said it will seek a spot. Unions like the Allied Pilots Association, which represents all American Airlines' pilots, are also likely to earn seats.

Food, fuel and other suppliers are sure to be in the mix as well, Brandt said, as are cities whose airports are hubs for AMR. Many of those cities, which include Miami, Chicago on Los Angeles, issued special revenue bonds on the company's behalf to fund improvement projects, Brandt explained.

The interests of committee members may clash, especially if the committee includes more traditional financial creditors, like Wilmington Trust Co, holder of $460 million in senior notes.

That is a problem the trustee could address by appointing more than one committee, such as committee specifically for labor interests, said Kelli Alces, a professor at Florida State University College of Law.

But a single committee may be the best way for unsecured creditors to resolve their differences, Alces said.

It would also be cheaper. Monday's meeting is sure to be flooded with lawyers and financial advisors looking to represent creditors' committees, and more committees means more fees, said Harlan Platt, a bankruptcy expert and business professor at Northeastern University.

Besides, Platt said, unsecured creditors are more united than divided, as they all face a potentially meager recovery.

Bankruptcy rules allow AMR to seek to reject union contracts altogether, kicking their claims into the general unsecured pool. Since each claimant in that pool gets a pro-rata share of what is left after other creditors are paid, more claimants means less payback for all.

The real fight for unsecured creditors, Platt said, is with secured claimants, whose nearly $5 billion in claims is collateralized by liens on aircraft, airport gates and other AMR assets.

"It's in the best interest of the unsecured group to take an awful lot of risk to try to raise value," said Platt, a member of restructuring industry group the Turnaround Management Association. "Secureds will be unwilling to accept any restructuring proposal that puts their money at risk."

For that reason, Platt said he would not be surprised to see the trustee appoint a separate committee to advocate for secured creditors.

The bankruptcy case is In re AMR Corp et al, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York, No. 11-15463.

(Reporting by Nick Brown; Editing by Gary Hill)

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/business/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20111202/bs_nm/us_amr_credcomm

guy fawkes day jesse ventura stevie williams steve williams mike wallace mike wallace koch brothers

Sunday, December 4, 2011

Google in talks to take on Amazon in retail: report (Reuters)

(Reuters) ? Google Inc is pondering an Internet service to help consumers shop online and take advantage of same-day delivery, hoping to stanch the loss of Web traffic to Amazon.com Inc, the Wall Street Journal reported.

The Internet search leader is in talks with major retailers and shippers, including Macy's, Gap Inc and OfficeMax, to set up the service, the newspaper cited people familiar with the matter as saying.

Google and Amazon did not return calls for comment. Macy's, Gap and OfficeMax were not immediately available for comment.

Google may be casting a wary eye on the popularity of Amazon.com's Prime service -- which allows rapid shipping for an annual fee -- fearing it will entice away the Web traffic it depends on from its own sites.

The plan under consideration stops short of selling directly to consumers, the Journal cited a person familiar with the matter as saying.

Google will instead work in tandem with retailers' websites, combining an existing product-search feature that directs shoppers to those sites, with a new shipping service that it intends to create and oversee, the Journal reported.

That new feature is designed to determine if a nearby physical store has a desired product in stock. Google could then offer the consumer an option to receive their goods within a day or two, for a fee, the newspaper said.

Google plans a test trial in the San Francisco Bay area for the new initiative, which could also involve United Parcel Service Inc, the Journal added.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/internet/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20111201/tc_nm/us_google

wiccan pumpkin carvings mcrib pumpkin seeds mark herzlich malawi malawi

Saturday, December 3, 2011

Jessica Simpson to Have a Girl! Or a Boy!


Jessica Simpson will find out the gender of her baby on Monday, but the singer took a guess last night at the launch of her sister's clothing line in New York City.

"I think it' a girl," the pregnant star told People, while fiance Eric Johnson chimed in with: "I think it's a boy."

One of them will probably be correct.

Jessica Simpson and Nephew

Why is Jessica - seen above getting some practice in with nephew Bronx - even learning her first child's sex ahead of time?

"I like to plan things out," Simpson told Us Weekly at the same event. "It'll be good to know what colors to make the nursery. I'm obsessed with thinking about what it's going to look like."

We're just glad there are no signs here of a pregnancy in crisis, as a recent report claimed. Quite the opposite, in fact, as Simpson gushed last night over "knowing that [Eric] and I created something inside of me... We love each other so much, and knowing that I love this baby inside of me is so amazing."

[Photo: WENN.com]

Source: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2011/12/jessica-simpson-to-have-a-girl-or-a-boy/

grammy nominations philadelphia eagles vince young vince young john carter trans siberian orchestra trans siberian orchestra

ADATA S101 flash drive brings USB 3.0 speeds, shrugs off shocks and splashes

USB flash drives may not be the hottest tech hardware out there, but that doesn't mean they can't look good. ADATA's latest thumb drive refresh packs the same military-spec rough and tumble credentials of last year's S007, but this time it's guarding some USB 3.0 goodness. While the design of the S107 is nigh-on identical to its predecessor, it's now capable of read speeds of up to 100MB per second. The rubberized storage sticks, available in red and blue, will be available in 8GB, 16GB and 32GB sizes, although ADATA is still keeping schtum on pricing and release dates.

Continue reading ADATA S101 flash drive brings USB 3.0 speeds, shrugs off shocks and splashes

ADATA S101 flash drive brings USB 3.0 speeds, shrugs off shocks and splashes originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:17:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceADATA  | Email this | Comments


Source: http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/TtXEMYkyugM/

made in america icam patrice o neal. joran van der sloot osteopathy osteopathy diphtheria

Friday, December 2, 2011

Kids of All Weights Benefit From Car Seats (HealthDay)

FRIDAY, Dec. 2 (HealthDay News) -- Child safety and booster seats protect children of all weights, including those on the heavy side.

That's the finding of a new study that looked at nearly 1,000 children, aged 1 to 8 years, who were involved in crashes. All of the children were properly restrained in the correct child safety or booster seat for their height and weight, according to the report published online and in the December print issue of the journal Pediatrics.

"Given that nearly 32 percent of children in the United States are categorized as overweight or obese, and motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death and injury for all children, we wanted to better understand how these two threats to children's health interact," lead author Dr. Mark Zonfrillo, an attending emergency physician at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, said in a hospital news release.

"This research should reassure parents that their only concern when it comes to car seat safety should be to follow the most recent guidelines set by the American Academy of Pediatrics," he added.

Those guidelines, revised earlier this year, outline the use of car safety and booster seats based on a child's height, weight and age.

"A good time to re-evaluate child safety seat needs is during your child's routine medical visits. Compare your child's weight and height measurements to the manufacturer's acceptable ranges on the seat's labels or instructions," Zonfrillo recommended.

"There's no 'one-size-fits-all.' If your older child moved to a booster seat at age 5, don't necessarily assume it will be the same for his or her younger siblings," he said.

He and his colleagues also said pediatricians and family doctors should advise parents to check their child's height and weight measurements against their safety seat specifications.

More information

Here's where you can find the American Academy of Pediatrics' car safety seat guidelines.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/parenting/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/hsn/20111202/hl_hsn/kidsofallweightsbenefitfromcarseats

josephine baker pumpkin patch troy polamalu boo at the zoo when is daylight savings time 2011 when is daylight savings time 2011 renaissance festival

Analysis: Confusion not progress expected at Afghan meet (Reuters)

KABUL/WASHINGTON (Reuters) ? Next week's Bonn conference on Afghanistan was supposed to offer a chance to renew Western commitment to stabilize the Asian nation as foreign troops head home after a decade battling the Taliban.

Instead it looks set to be a high-profile reminder of the West's tortuous ties with a country where they have sunk billions of dollars, and of Afghanistan's uncertain future as NATO nations facing economic crisis at home try to pull loose from a costly war some believe can no longer be won outright.

A strategic partnership pact between Washington and Kabul that was expected to provide a framework for Monday's meeting in Bonn of officials from dozens of nations has not been pinned down in time -- and may take months more to secure.

Pakistan, an insecure but powerful neighbor and perhaps the single most critical player in efforts to end Afghan violence, is boycotting the meet after NATO aircraft killed 24 of its soldiers in a weekend attack the alliance called a "tragic ... accident".

Hopes for an appearance by Taliban representatives and a breakthrough in reconciliation efforts have also faded.

And hanging over the whole meeting will be the weight of a decade in which thousands of lives and billions of dollars have failed to secure Afghanistan and achieved only fragile gains in education and women's rights, falling well short of the promises made at a conference ten years ago in the same city.

"There is definitely a sharp contrast between this Bonn conference and 2001, when there was hope and enthusiasm in the air and a desire to move beyond the Taliban and do reconstruction," said Kamran Bokhari, vice-president for South Asian affairs at political risk analysts Stratfor.

"Now you have Pakistan not attending this conference, so that does throw a monkey wrench into the system ... it's not really clear what we can expect."

World leaders had high hopes for Afghanistan when they met in Bonn in December 2001, just a few months after the September 11 attacks on New York in Washington prompted western nations to back the toppling of the Taliban government.

It was hoped civil conflict would soon recede into history and that Afghanistan would move into modernity, embracing broadrights for women and chipping away at endemic poverty.

NO HANDOUTS, NEW ECONOMY?

A decade later, the United States and others in the West have dramatically scaled back their vision of what can be accomplished in a country that has earned a reputation over centuries as a 'graveyard of empires.'

Afghanistan itself says it is not looking for handouts.

"Bonn is not about asking the international community for financial help. What we need is a firm political commitment from them to help us stand on our own two feet," deputy foreign minister Jawed Ludin told Reuters.

Western diplomats in Kabul say that the main aim of the conference is to show Afghans they will not hurry away at the end of 2014 as the Soviet Union did after their military withdrawal -- and to remind world leaders to keep Afghanistan on their agenda at a time of many competing crises.

Foreign ministers from around the world are flying into Germany for a meeting that is still likely to make headlines even if there is little of substance achieved.

It will also bring together an unusually diverse cross-section of countries with a stake in Afghanistan's future, from NATO members to Iran, Russia and China.

"When we're done in Bonn, there's going to be a vision for what the future of Afghanistan is going to be like," said one senior U.S. official. "The point of ... Bonn is to send message to Taliban and anybody else that actually international engagement and investment in Afghanistan is not over."

The meeting will showcase a scheme known as "the new silk road" to bolster Afghanistan's weak economy. U.S. officials will also begin pressing fellow donor nations to define future aid commitments in coming months, perhaps with the goal of announcing pledges at a NATO summit in Chicago in May.

"FIGHT, TALK, BUILD"

In the past year the Obama administration has embraced a peace deal between the Afghan government and the Taliban as a central goal. But there is little sign yet that embryonic peace efforts have the potential to yield a credible agreement.

"Pakistan's refusal to attend the Bonn conference is indicative of a broader discontent in the region towards the U.S.-led reconciliation approach of 'fight, talk, build,'" said Shamila Chaudhary, who was director for Afghanistan and Pakistan at the U.S. National Security Council until earlier this year and is now an analyst at the Eurasia Group.

"Many had hoped that the fighting would have stopped in time for Bonn. Since it hasn't, the entire political process remains a big question mark," she said.

Diplomats acknowledge too that without the hoped-for deal with the United States -- the country that will have to foot the lion's share of the bill for Afghan security forces and more in coming years -- the conference will lack force.

"If we had got the strategic partnership with the United States, Bonn would have been more credible," said one senior diplomat in Kabul.

A framework deal with the United States for security collaboration should have allowed other countries to follow up with commitments to keep helping Afghanistan even when their troops are no longer fighting there.

WHO'LL BLINK FIRST?

The Afghans and the Americans both seem to think that the other side need the deal more than they do and are playing a reckless game of brinksmanship.

A main stumbling block has been the night-time raids that have become deeply sensitive after civilian deaths in a string of botched operations. Afghan President Hamid Karzai wants them banned; the U.S. military says it can't succeed without them.

Another sticking point is immunity from Afghan courts for U.S. soldiers and the detention of Afghan suspects.

Afghanistan will remain heavily dependent on outside help. It faces a $7 billion annual hole in its accounts after 2014, according to a recent World Bank survey. Its army is unlikely to survive in fighting form without foreign cash.

Yet U.S. lawmakers facing pressure to cut costs are wondering how much they will have to fork out, especially amid questions about the reliability of a deeply corrupt government whose leader Karzai has at best rocky ties with the West.

President Barack Obama, eyeing re-election in 2012, appears determined to withdraw steadily as foreign troops hand control of security to Afghans by the end of 2014, even though his commanders fret about what they can accomplish before then.

But if Afghanistan splinters into civil war, the way it did after the collapse of the Soviet Union brought an end to army salary subsidies and weapons flow, it risks becoming a haven once again for militants who want to target the United States.

"Done right, our military drawdown will motivate Afghans and their neighbors to negotiate seriously with each other about their future," John Kerry, the influential Democratic senator, wrote in an op-ed published on Thursday. "Done wrong, it could precipitate another war."

The Afghan government is banking on a U.S. desire for future bases allowing it to keep an eye on Afghanistan and Pakistan as it seeks to neutralize a threat posed by militants including the Taliban, the Haqqani network and al Qaeda.

Yet the Obama administration is also grappling with another urgent desire: to finally end a long, unpopular war.

Analysts like Jeffrey Dressler of the Institute for the Study of War in Washington say militants are well aware of that yearning to go home. "By showing ourselves as wanting to get out, it's like showing red meat to all these groups," he said.

(Writing by Emma Graham-Harrison; editing by Missy Ryan and editing by Anthony Boadle)

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/asia/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20111201/wl_nm/us_afghanistan_usa

chia seeds aziz ansari aziz ansari corn maze icloud apple update apple update