Tuesday, January 10, 2012

India - Pakistan: Background and Threat

What are these nuclear neighbors fighting over?

The swiftly escalating dispute between Pakistan and India threatens the future of the war on terrorism and could result in the nightmare of nuclear war. What are these two nuclear-armed neighbors fighting over and how could their dispute threaten the United States?

Kashmir: Paradise Lost
The long-disputed territory of Kashmir (map) spans the northern border between Pakistan (map) and India (map) in a valley of the Himalayan Mountains. Today, loosely defined regions of Kashmir are controlled by Pakistan, India and China, all of which have nuclear arsenals.

When India and Pakistan won independence from Britain in 1947, Kashmir was given the choice of being governed by either country. While Maharaja, Hari Singh, then provincial leader of Kashmir preferred independence, he allowed the key powers of government to be given to India in return for military protection.

Since then, India and Pakistan have fought two wars over Kashmir: one in 1947-1948, the latest in 1965. The next may come soon, unless diplomatic efforts spearheaded by the U.S. succeed.

Tensions reached a peak on Dec. 13, when suicide gunmen staged a bloody surprise attack on the Indian Parliament. India accused Pakistan of backing the attacks. Pakistan denied the charges.

On Jan. 1, 2002, India and Pakistan renewed an agreement not to attack each other's nuclear facilities. While viewed as a step back from war, the countries had earlier reduced diplomatic relations and banned most travel across their common border. Massive troop buildups along the border continue to be spiked by regular exchanges of small arms and mortar fire.

Along with India and Pakistan vying for control of the valley, a growing list of militant Kashmiri separatist groups have sprung up since the early 1990s. "Militant" has become the diplomatic term for "terrorist," while the militants call themselves "freedom fighters."

Under the Indian Independence Act of 1947, India still retains official control of Kashmir and claims to keep some 125,000 military troops there. Independent defense observers say the actual figure is far higher.

Militant Groups in Kashmir
The three largest militant factions in Kashmir are: Hizbul Mujahideen; Lashkar-e-Toyeba; and Harkat-ul-Mujahideen. Within each faction, are sub-groups fighting either for Pakistani control or Kashmiri independence. The only thing all members of all three groups appear to agree on is the total ouster of India from the valley.

India claims that all three factions maintain training and operational bases in Pakistan and receive moral and political support and protection from the Pakistani government. Pakistan President Perez Musharraf recently purged several members of the powerful Pakistani intelligence agency he believed to be secretly supporting Kashmiri militants.

India further claims Kashmiri militant factions receive weapons and ammunition directly from Pakistan, a claim Musharraf strongly denies.

To further complicate matters, hundreds of al Qaeda and Taliban fighters who fled Afghanistan are believed to have entered Kashmir.

An ancient Mogul emperor once declared of Kashmir, "If there is paradise anywhere on earth, it is here, it is here, it is here." Unfortunately, the modern Kashmir appears to be a paradise only for violence.

Nuclear Arsenals
Shortly after China's first nuclear tests in the early 1960's, India began its own nuclear arms development program culminating with the detonation of the "Smiling Buddha" test device in 1974. By the late 1970s, Pakistan's nuclear arms development program was well under way.

While India's weapons technology is currently viewed as being more advanced than that of its rival, Pakistan is now reported to be getting extensive technical assistance from its much more nuclear-experienced ally, China.

U.S. intelligence experts believe Pakistan now has about 30 nuclear-tipped missiles with a range of around 300km.

Threat to the U.S.
A war -- nuclear or not -- between two of our allies in the war on terror would certainly cripple if not destroy the tenuous alliance of Middle Eastern countries forged by U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell.

On Dec. 30, Sen. Bob Graham (D-Florida), chairman of the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee called the India-Pakistan conflict "one of the most dangerous situations on the globe." Appearing on CNN's "Late Edition," Graham warned, "Americans should be gravely concerned."

Previous wars between India and Pakistan over control of Kashmir were waged before either country had nuclear arms. "We have allowed the situation in Kashmir to fester for over half a century," said Sen. Graham. "We should have and we need today to apply more diplomatic effort to resolve that issue."

At the end of the Gulf War, India's then Chief of Staff was asked by reporters what he had learned from observing the conflict in Iraq. "Don't fight the Americans without nuclear weapons," he replied.

Source: http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa010202.htm

what time is it cain gingrich debate andy rooney dies andy rooney dies bank transfer day daylight savings 2011 day light savings

Monday, January 9, 2012

EU stands firm on airline emissions despite Chinese fury

The European Union refused Thursday to back down from a disputed airline emissions fee despite China's refusal to pay the new charge to land in Europe.

The 27-nation EU began to require all airlines to buy pollution permits to fly to Europe on January 1 despite stiff opposition from the United States, China and many other countries.

Some airlines have started to pass the cost on to their passengers.

"We are not modifying our law and we are not backing down," Isaac Valero-Ladron, spokesman for EU climate action commissioner Connie Hedegaard, told a news conference.

"It's like if the Chinese want to do business in Europe, like open a restaurant or something, they have to comply with the health and safety requirements. This is not that different," he said.

"If you want to operate in Europe you have to respect the law, you have to respect the environmental law."

The China Air Transport Association, which represents the country's airlines, warned that Chinese carriers would not pay the charge.

The EU system calls for fines of 100 euros per tonne of CO2 against companies that refuse to comply, or a flight ban as a last resort. The current market price for one tonne of CO2 is around 7.0 euros.

But Chinese airlines are unlikely to be penalised immediately as carriers have until April 30 next year to calculate their annual emissions and buy polluting rights for 2012.

Under the EU's Emissions Trading System (ETS), airlines will have to buy 15 percent of polluting rights accorded to them in 2012 -- the 15 percent is estimated at 32 million tonnes per year of CO2 by the European Commission. The measure could bring in 256 million euros this year.

Despite their objections, US and Chinese airlines have applied for the 85 percent of allowances that are handed out for free, Valero-Ladron said.

The EU, the only region in the world to make airlines pay for emissions, says it will provide exemptions to air carriers from nations that enact similar measures to reduce airborne pollution.

"If any country wants to reduce emissions differently, that is fine with us as long as their measures have an equivalent environmental impact," Valero-Ladron said.

He said the Commission was involved in talks with countries over the issue.

The 27-nation bloc decided to include airlines, responsible for three percent of global emissions, in the ETS in the absence of a global agreement to cap aviation emissions.

The rules came into force on Sunday after the EU's highest court last month rejected a challenge brought by North American carriers, which had argued that it amounted to a tax and violated international aviation laws.

Foreign airlines and governments are still fuming.

Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Hong Lei urged the EU authorities to "resolve this issue in a pragmatic and prudent manner."

Some airlines have announced new ticket fees since the EU's rules came into force.

US carrier Delta Air Lines, one of the world's biggest airlines, added a $6 surcharge for two-way flights between the United States and Europe.

Germany's Lufthansa indicated it would raise its fuel surcharge, a move taken by Belgian carrier Brussels Airlines, which increased it by 10 euros to 135 euros for international flights and by three euros to 39 euros for EU routes.

The European Commission argues that the cost for airlines is manageable, estimating that the scheme could prompt carriers to add between 4.0 and 24 euros ($32) to the price of a two-way long-haul flights.

A one-way flight between New York and London emits around 385 kilogrammes of CO2 per passenger, a cost of around $5.40 per passenger at current carbon prices of 12 euros per tonne, according to Valero-Ladron.

Since airlines are only required to pay for 15 percent of their allowances, with 85 percent handed out for free, the actual cost would be between $1 and $2, he added.

"This is hardly an insurmountable issue for them," he said.

Source: http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/EU_stands_firm_on_airline_emissions_despite_Chinese_fury_999.html

chris herren mitt romney portlandia detroit lions new orleans saints houston texans houston texans

Monday, January 2, 2012

staceyhedman: A very happy new year to my Twitter peeps! 2012 is gonna crazy rock :-)

  • Passer la navigation
  • Twitter sur votre mobile ? Cliquez ici m.twitter.com!
  • Passer cette ?tape
  • Connexion
Loader Twitter.com
  • Connexion
A very happy new year to my Twitter peeps! 2012 is gonna crazy rock :-) staceyhedman

Stacey Hedman

Pied de page

Source: http://twitter.com/staceyhedman/statuses/153351495222435840

michael buble michael buble teddy roosevelt rita hayworth rita hayworth lakers rumors kellie pickler

Arab body calls for pullout of monitors in Syria

This image made from amateur video and made available by Shaam News Network dated Friday, Dec. 30, 2011, purports to show protesters running from a water canon in Idlib, Syria. Syria's two largest opposition groups signed an agreement on setting up a democracy after President Bashar Assad's regime falls, opposition figures said Saturday, Dec. 31, 2011. (AP Photo/Shaam News Network via APTN) TV OUT. THE ASSOCIATED PRESS CANNOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE CONTENT, DATE, LOCATION OR AUTHENTICITY OF THIS MATERIAL. TV OUT

This image made from amateur video and made available by Shaam News Network dated Friday, Dec. 30, 2011, purports to show protesters running from a water canon in Idlib, Syria. Syria's two largest opposition groups signed an agreement on setting up a democracy after President Bashar Assad's regime falls, opposition figures said Saturday, Dec. 31, 2011. (AP Photo/Shaam News Network via APTN) TV OUT. THE ASSOCIATED PRESS CANNOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE CONTENT, DATE, LOCATION OR AUTHENTICITY OF THIS MATERIAL. TV OUT

This image made from amateur video and made available by Shaam News Network dated Friday, Dec. 30, 2011, purports to show a wounded protester in Idlib, Syria. Syria's two largest opposition groups signed an agreement on setting up a democracy after President Bashar Assad's regime falls, opposition figures said Saturday, Dec. 31, 2011. (AP Photo/Shaam News Network via APTN) TV OUT. THE ASSOCIATED PRESS CANNOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE CONTENT, DATE, LOCATION OR AUTHENTICITY OF THIS MATERIAL. TV OUT

This image made from amateur video and made available by Shaam News Network dated Friday, Dec. 30, 2011, purports to show a wounded protester carried away by others in Idlib, Syria. Syria's two largest opposition groups signed an agreement on setting up a democracy after President Bashar Assad's regime falls, opposition figures said Saturday, Dec. 31, 2011. (AP Photo/Shaam News Network via APTN) TV OUT. THE ASSOCIATED PRESS CANNOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE CONTENT, DATE, LOCATION OR AUTHENTICITY OF THIS MATERIAL. TV OUT

This image made from amateur video and made available by Shaam News Network and dated Friday, Dec. 30, 2011, purports to show an Arab League monitor describing seeing a sniper in Daraa, Syria. Syria's two largest opposition groups signed an agreement on setting up a democracy after President Bashar Assad's regime falls, opposition figures said Saturday, Dec. 31, 2011. (AP Photo/Shaam News Network via APTN) TV OUT. THE ASSOCIATED PRESS CANNOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE CONTENT, DATE, LOCATION OR AUTHENTICITY OF THIS MATERIAL. TV OUT

This image made from amateur video and made available by Shaam News Network and dated Friday, Dec. 30, 2011, purports to show an Arab League monitor talking with Syrians in Daraa, Syria. Syria's two largest opposition groups signed an agreement on setting up a democracy after President Bashar Assad's regime falls, opposition figures said Saturday, Dec. 31, 2011. (AP Photo/Shaam News Network via APTN) TV OUT. THE ASSOCIATED PRESS CANNOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE CONTENT, DATE, LOCATION OR AUTHENTICITY OF THIS MATERIAL. TV OUT

(AP) ? A pan-Arab body called Sunday for the immediate withdrawal of the Arab League monitors in Syria because President Bashar Assad's regime has kept up killings of government opponents even in the presence of the observers.

The 88-member Arab Parliament said that Arabs are angered by the Syrian regime's ongoing killings while the nearly 100 monitors are in the country. The monitors are supposed to be ensuring Syria complies with terms of the League's plan to end the 9-month-old crackdown on dissent ? a plan Syria agreed to on Dec. 19.

However, the Kuwaiti head of the Arab Parliament, Ali Salem al-Deqbasi, said the presence of the monitors is distracting from the "flagrant violations" committed by Assad's regime.

"The killing of children and the violation of human rights law is happening in the presence of Arab League monitors, raising the fury of Arab people," he said.

"The mission of the Arab League team has missed its aim of stopping the killing of children and ensuring the withdrawal of troops from the Syrian streets, giving the Syrian regime a cover to commit inhumane acts under the noses of the Arab League observers," al-Deqbasi said in a statement.

The Arab League created the Arab Parliament, which is made up of lawmakers and advisers from states around the Middle East. Its recommendations are nonbinding and it operates separately from the Arab League.

While the Arab Parliament has little sway on Damascus or the Arab League, al-Deqbasi's remarks about the observer mission represents growing concern about the monitors' ability to deter Assad's regime from killing protesters.

According to activists, more than 150 people have been killed across the country since the observers began their one-month mission on Tuesday.

The U.N. says more than 5,000 people have died as the government has sought to crush the revolt.

The Arab League plan demands that the government remove its security forces and heavy weapons from cities, start talks with the opposition and allow human rights workers and journalists into the country. It also calls for the release of all political prisoners.

The ongoing violence in Syria, and questions about the human rights record of the head of the Arab League monitors, Sudanese Lt. Gen. Mohamed Ahmed Mustafa al-Dabi, are reinforcing the opposition's view that Syria's limited cooperation with the observers is merely a ploy by Assad to buy time and forestall more international condemnation and sanctions.

The Syrian opposition has called for the removal of al-Dabi, a longtime loyalist of Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir, who is wanted on an international arrest warrant on charges of genocide in the Darfur region.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/cae69a7523db45408eeb2b3a98c0c9c5/Article_2012-01-01-ML-Syria-Monitors-Mission/id-bad8120273414d58b9cd20c1bdde5dc5

rumpelstiltskin rumpelstiltskin occupy oakland occupy oakland yahoo.com/mail david nelson david nelson

Sunday, January 1, 2012

Obama wooing veterans in campaign (AP)

WASHINGTON ? President Barack Obama ended one war and is winding down another, bringing home tens of thousands of U.S. troops. Now he wants them to pay him back ? with votes.

"You stood up for America. America needs to stand up for you," Obama told service members returning to Fort Bragg, N.C. from Iraq recently.

Expect to hear that pitch throughout the next year as the president's campaign, mindful that large numbers of veterans and military families live in states crucial to his re-election chances, highlights his efforts to promote jobs and benefits for veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. Republicans, meanwhile, already are countering his record, noting high unemployment among veterans.

The outreach to veterans is part of a larger effort by Obama to build inroads with voting blocs traditionally outside the Democratic umbrella while it tries to reactivate the coalition of women, minorities and young voters who helped propel him to the White House in 2008. Obama's campaign is free to focus on building a diverse base of support for the general election because he faces no primary opponent. His eventual GOP challenger doesn't have that luxury.

While Democrats have traditionally trailed Republicans on defense and national security matters, Obama senses an opening with veterans because he has generally received high marks from voters for his handling of terrorism ? especially after the U.S. raid in May that killed Osama bin Laden ? and in managing the U.S.'s relationships with other countries. A recent AP-GfK poll found that 59 percent of adults felt Obama would keep America safe, a mark that has remained steady throughout 2011.

Exit polls in 2008 showed that Obama received about 44 percent of voters who said they served in the military, while 54 percent voted for Republican John McCain, a former Navy pilot who was a prisoner of war for more than five years during the Vietnam War. Four years earlier, George W. Bush, who sought re-election as the U.S. waged wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, won 57 percent of voters who said they served in the military, compared with 41 percent for Democrat John Kerry.

There are obvious political reasons for Obama's effort.

Several states that will be heavily contested next year have a significant military presence. Florida, home to a number of military installations, has more than 1.6 million veterans, according to the Veterans Administration. Virginia and North Carolina, political battlegrounds that Obama carried in 2008, both have about 800,000 veterans while Colorado, another important state in the Obama re-election calculation, has more than 400,000 veterans.

This year, the playing field in the fight to woo veterans may end up being level if anyone other than Texas Gov. Rick Perry and Texas Rep. Ron Paul ? the only two with military experience in the GOP field ? win the nomination. Obama had no military experience before becoming commander in chief. (The last time both parties didn't have a presidential candidate with military experience was 1944, when President Franklin D. Roosevelt defeated Thomas E. Dewey.)

As the nation winds down wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Obama and first lady Michelle Obama have held numerous events at military bases and in communities heavily populated by veterans. During a bus tour through North Carolina and Virginia in October, the president and first lady stopped at Joint Base Langley-Eustis in the heart of a large military community in Hampton and Newport News, Va. Since entering the White House, the first lady has held about 50 events with military families in 14 states.

Obama also has talked up his work on a new GI Bill helping veterans and service members to attend college and on tax incentives for companies that hire veterans, a piece of his jobs bill that won passage in Congress during the fall. The Democratic National Committee featured the incentives in ads that aired in North Carolina, New Mexico and Ohio.

Bob Wallace, executive director of the Veterans of Foreign Wars, said Obama has been "very positive" for veterans. He said members of his organization are looking for specific ways the next White House administration ? Democrat or Republican ? intends to help veterans.

"The cost of war continues after the last shot is fired and after you pull the trucks over the border into Kuwait," Wallace said. "You've got a lot of expenses to take care of these guys and gals and that's the commitment we're looking for anybody who wants to be president of the United States."

Republicans challenge Obama's record on veterans' issues by pointing to high jobless rates among those returning from military service ? more than 11 percent for veterans who have served since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks are unemployed. Republican presidential candidates also have raised concerns about defense spending and the move by Obama to withdraw troops from Iraq and Afghanistan.

Scott Rutter, a retired Army lieutenant colonel from New City, N.Y., who serves as a veterans policy adviser to former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney's campaign, said many veterans are concerned about their job prospects after leaving the military along with a disability claims backlog that can leave a veteran waiting months or even years to get a claim processed.

"We need leadership. You've got to put a little do-ah in the hooah," Rutter said. "You can talk about it but you have to have results."

Surrounding Obama's trip to Fort Bragg, Romney wrote in an op-ed in The Fayetteville Observer that "words of welcome to our returning soldiers are not enough," calling it "a disgrace that those who are now returning from Iraq join other Iraq veterans suffering from unemployment above 11 percent." And in an October speech at The Citadel, South Carolina's military college, Romney vowed to increase defense spending and increase the number of Navy ships.

Perry, running behind in early voting states, has increasingly drawn attention to his military credentials, running ads featuring decorated veterans touting his leadership abilities. He has criticized Obama for troop withdrawals from Iraq and Afghanistan. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, meanwhile, has opposed defense cuts except for waste.

Paul, who served as an Air Force physician during the Vietnam era, has opposed efforts to require military retirees to pay more for health care coverage. Both parties have discussed cost-cutting changes to the military's health care program to help deal with large deficits.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/obama/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111230/ap_on_go_ot/us_obama_veterans

nene leakes danny woodhead forgetting sarah marshall aaron hernandez aaron hernandez portland news portland news

Vienna's tech University practises money laundering at hacking contest

iCTF logo Simulated money laundering was this year's task at the annual "International Capture The Flag" (iCTF) hacking contest. 87 teams made up of computer science students from around the world, including 14 from Germany and three from Austria, competed in the eight hour tournament, organised by the University of California Santa Barbara (UCSB). There was just one UK entry, that scored zero points. The We_0wn_You team from the Vienna University of Technology's Seclab took first place, overtaking the team from NRU ITMO in St. Petersburg, which had led for much of the competition. In third place, a respectable distance behind the top two, was the FluxFingers team from Germany's Ruhr University of Bochum.

Each team started with an identical system image with a range of outgoing services, such as email and SMS gateways. The objective was to patch the security vulnerabilities in these services, to defend the system from attacks and to keep it up and running. Teams earned 'dirty funds' by performing tricky tasks. To launder this money and exchange it for clean points, teams were required to steal hash values from other teams' systems. The exchange rate applied when converting money to points was modified depending on the level of security of the team's system (defence level).

Systems targeted for attack needed to be carefully selected. The more times hash values from a service were used, the greater the risk that the police would catch anyone using them, causing the user to forfeit the dirty money generated from their use. The team operating the hacked system was also awarded a cut of the laundered money. Teams could also tip off the police about other teams, making the exchange of hashes a little more complicated.

"The key to our success was our automated money laundering system, which automatically analysed risk", explained Adrian Dabrowski from Vienna University of Technology. "Depending on the odds, we either laundered money or passed the hash value to the police." Forwarding hash values to the virtual cops reduced the defence level of the compromised team and with it the money-to-points exchange rate.

The team from Vienna, which has previous form, having won the 2006 iCTF, has now qualified for Defcon CTF in summer 2012. In contrast to iCTF, which runs over the web, Defcon CTF requires teams to travel to Las Vegas. The team is now looking for sponsors.

(Daniel AJ Sokolov / crve)

Source: http://rss.feedsportal.com/c/32569/f/491736/s/1b6bd26d/l/0L0Sh0Eonline0N0Csecurity0Cnews0Citem0CVienna0Es0Etech0EUniversity0Epractises0Emoney0Elaundering0Eat0Ehacking0Econtest0E1390A6740Bhtml0Cfrom0Crss/story01.htm

daniel day lewis patti stanger

Cenk Uygur: Vote Against Obama in Iowa (Huffington post)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories News, RSS Feeds and Widgets via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/180573815?client_source=feed&format=rss

walmart black friday raiders vincent jackson veterans day paterno oakland raiders carson palmer